#atomic #educated #guess #question
.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab @rosaotm
Letsmake an educated guess
“if the maginficently boring world of nulsbohr s shell model is rhymingsomewhat by shellcount:
********
what?is? The?thresshold energy? To form n shellcount superwineglasses from afterall (!)cumulative chargeimbalancespikeoutsmallwineglasses
********
And is this thresshold always the same or doesthe second superwineglass and or thrid have different threshholds”
/////
Whywouldoyuwant that russian chinese nuclear weapons dont detonate intheir backyard? Hmmm aeh… pe..ople?..aeh lives? Aeh..
Itis complementary to shells of bohr but itis not that
Superwineglass from smaller wineglass deformed wantsto surface because itis. A cumulative chargeimbalance spikeout
Thereon the refine is that isotopes would have different superwineglas combinations
Uinthinkable in shells model
So in simple
Whattheymayhave interpreted as orbit shells
Byplanets
May rhyme to superwineglasscount?
Lets verifyit
The divergence byisotope variant wouldmake different superwineglasses
Which chargeimbalance spikeout of electron is inwhich superwineglassl or atwhich threshhold they overjump ans change superwineglass is of interest too
W
H
E
E
E
E
Y
If.
Itis a correct tweak
Thatis
////
Letsreward whomeasures it first
Heyatomics heyscience
Lets reward whomeasures it first
2
The new atom tweak affects the veryheavy atoms iehow does wineglass chargeimbalance spikeout gets actually tothe surface ifit does so deforms where and reshuffles the nucleus how now if it d o e s get tothesurface
the oldmodel was cumulative too but ididntthink of these might want to cumulate to one single spikeout chargeimbalance blobout
Letsnot bullshit around big nuclei
Itis simple but absolutely critical inthesense that nuclear pressure inside nucleus forming a cumulated cumulative big chargeimbalance
Means
There
Is
Inmother nature a thresshold after which own wineglass will be squeezed into superwineglass
********
This
Very
Energy
Threshhold
Is
Why there is
Matter
Reformed another proton and reformed anotherproton
And anther
Is this threshhold lower ie it occurs sooner onlower energies in smaller nuclei that squeeze
Then there maybe more than one superwineglasses depends onthe core internal nuclear composition
Ie these wineglasses wantttothe surface and that superwineglass isontheoiter side odthe atom
So theyform a
Second wuperwineglass
Simple
Reallysimple
Stuff
But
We
Must
M
U
S
T
Measure it
Itis a declination derived from cumulative chargeimabalce spikeout
And breaks down into merged cumulated superwineglass
Onincreased nucleus pressure
********
/////
****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this Very Threshhold Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance
Lets reward the f i r s t that measures it or disprooves it
Thereisno way icanmeasure atomic nuclear electron shapes
Atomics But someone will measure yup cumulative bigwineglasssquueezewith threshhold to meld so itwill merge at this point protonneutroncount withthefirst big cumulation and thesecount the second big cumulation
Depends on mergethreshholds onthatcount a third and so on
there wereserobullshit withthe measurer geniusses
Energypeople are
Brilliant
They
Would find in quicker than quick a true or false
Ifits falseits likethe modelbefore
Ifits a merge meld threshhold and iam eeeeek since 250am becasue the chargeimbalance spilkeout
M
U
S
T
Be cumulative thenitis a miracle in matterformationdetail
S
Itmeans atleastone or more supercumulationsareposisble
******
Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this
Very
Threshhold
Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond
Which.
Very.
Merge meld threshhold
This.
Is
Critical
**************
Where
Is
This
Point
Ifitis correct
W
H
E
E
E
E
E
E
Y
Cmoooon!! Letsfindit!
Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance
////
the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure
andor bond extremely on other neutrons
or and in neutronlacking isotopes? with high nucleus pressure atleast?
allofthis stuff is declination and measure
////
itis a matter of measuring now
ifthere are threshholds after which the chargeimbalance spikeout recumulates
because it is a cumulative charge imbalance as typed then itmay form notnecessarily unlimited sizes
itwould mean
howmany enlarged wineglasses then as bottompart of it?
howdoesitlook
i
f
correct hypothesis theory that is
arethere cumulation threshholds afterwhich chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass chargeimbalances merge
and what are their sizelimits
bigger size fewer super wineglasses
smaller threshholds? more supersized ?
itis a matter measurable in big nuclei
amatterof measuring and declination
but
wow
if true
////
a variable strenght oversized wineglass in big nuclei?
itwouldbe a beauty ifits true
all
a tick
a
l
o
t
more predictable
wow
if it turns out correct
eeeeekyey
lets findit
whatis the threshhold of energy or squeeze inside nucleus that it merges
maybe edges off
ohwow if true
/////
the newatom newelectron is not only about shape itis a chargeimbalance spikeout
i declinated some likely shapes ofthis but
measuring is the true accuracy then
lets verify a peculiar specialty that if above certain nuclei sizes someofthe chargeimbalanced spikedout merge as one
this mustbe above a certain energy threshhold or nucleuspressure
itis possible
******
seeit as how does the wineglass getout from inside huge nuclei
this can only be measured the deformations i suspected were shingle clownmouth cone with outer weakened ofcourse
******
letsnot be ignorant this can alter some big atom calculations
if it is not the case nothinglost nothing gained
/////
pics customers of new atom
ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before
and
lets not be ignorant
(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature
when we findit
it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!
when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost
allthebest
/////
btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople
*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a
threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big
andthisisthe excitationmystery
********
patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess
some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit
but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger
////
Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq
hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
///
Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq
Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow
Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout
There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans
Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this
Tweak
Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions
/////
Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq
Simplest example icna comeupwith:
********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: adjacent has a strong pull drain only
e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability
Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy relaysit reroutesit.
Sofar so bad
Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition
Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******
/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers
Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy
Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions
********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron
And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********
Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions
I am Christian KISS
BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/
Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64
Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss