#atomic #educated #guess #question  .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookh avenlab @losalamosnatlab @rosaotm ‎ Letsmake an educated guess  “if the maginficently boring world of nulsbohr s shell model is rhymingsomewhat by shellcount:  ******** what?is? The?thresshold energy? To form n shellcount superwineglasses from afterall (!)cumulative chargeimbalancespike outsmallwineglasses ******** And is this thresshold always the same or doesthe second superwin eglass and or thrid have different threshholds” ‎

#atomic #educated #guess #question
.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab @rosaotm

Letsmake an educated guess

“if the maginficently boring world of nulsbohr s shell model is rhymingsomewhat by shellcount:

********
what?is? The?thresshold energy? To form n shellcount superwineglasses from afterall (!)cumulative chargeimbalancespikeoutsmallwineglasses
********

And is this thresshold always the same or doesthe second superwineglass and or thrid have different threshholds”

/////

Whywouldoyuwant that russian chinese nuclear weapons dont detonate intheir backyard? Hmmm aeh… pe..ople?..aeh lives? Aeh..

Itis complementary to shells of bohr but itis not that

Superwineglass from smaller wineglass deformed wantsto surface because itis. A cumulative chargeimbalance spikeout

Thereon the refine is that isotopes would have different superwineglas combinations

Uinthinkable in shells model

So in simple
Whattheymayhave interpreted as orbit shells
Byplanets

May rhyme to superwineglasscount?
Lets verifyit

The divergence byisotope variant wouldmake different superwineglasses

Which chargeimbalance spikeout of electron is inwhich superwineglassl or atwhich threshhold they overjump ans change superwineglass is of interest too

W
H
E
E
E
E
Y

If.
Itis a correct tweak
Thatis

////

Letsreward whomeasures it first ‎
Heyatomics heyscience
Lets reward whomeasures it first

2
The new atom tweak affects the veryheavy atoms iehow does wineglass chargeimbalance spikeout gets actually tothe surface ifit does so deforms where and reshuffles the nucleus how now if it d o e s get tothesurface

the oldmodel was cumulative too but ididntthink of these might want to cumulate to one single spikeout chargeimbalance blobout

Letsnot bullshit around big nuclei

Itis simple but absolutely critical inthesense that nuclear pressure inside nucleus forming a cumulated cumulative big chargeimbalance
Means

There
Is
Inmother nature a thresshold after which own wineglass will be squeezed into superwineglass

********
This
Very
Energy
Threshhold
Is
Why there is
Matter

‎Reformed another proton and reformed anotherproton
And anther

Is this threshhold lower ie it occurs sooner onlower energies in smaller nuclei that squeeze

Then there maybe more than one superwineglasses depends onthe core internal nuclear composition

‎Ie these wineglasses wantttothe surface and that superwineglass isontheoiter side odthe atom

So theyform a
Second wuperwineglass

Simple
Reallysimple
Stuff
But
We
Must
M
U
S
T
Measure it

Itis a declination derived from cumulative chargeimabalce spikeout
And breaks down into merged cumulated superwineglass
Onincreased nucleus pressure
********

/////

****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this‎ Very Threshhold ‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

Lets reward the f i r s t that measures it or disprooves it
Thereisno way icanmeasure atomic nuclear electron shapes

Atomics But someone will measure yup cumulative bigwineglasssquueezewith threshhold to meld so itwill merge at this point protonneutroncount withthefirst big cumulation and thesecount the second big cumulation

Depends on mergethreshholds onthatcount a third and so on

there wereserobullshit withthe measurer geniusses

‎Energypeople are
Brilliant
They

Would find in quicker than quick a true or false
Ifits falseits likethe modelbefore
Ifits a merge meld threshhold and iam eeeeek since 250am becasue the chargeimbalance spilkeout
M
U
S
T
Be cumulative thenitis a miracle in matterformationdetail
S
Itmeans atleastone or more supercumulationsareposisble

******
Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this
Very
Threshhold
‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond
Which.
Very.
Merge meld threshhold
This.
Is
Critical
**************

Where
Is
This
Point

Ifitis correct

W
H
E
E
E
E
E
E
Y
Cmoooon!! Letsfindit!

Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

////
the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure
andor bond extremely on other neutrons

or and in neutronlacking isotopes? with high nucleus pressure atleast?
allofthis stuff is declination and measure

////
itis a matter of measuring now

ifthere are threshholds after which the chargeimbalance spikeout recumulates

because it is a cumulative charge imbalance as typed then itmay form notnecessarily unlimited sizes

itwould mean

howmany enlarged wineglasses then as bottompart of it?

howdoesitlook

i
f

correct hypothesis theory that is

arethere cumulation threshholds afterwhich chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass chargeimbalances merge

and what are their sizelimits

bigger size fewer super wineglasses

smaller threshholds? more supersized ?

itis a matter measurable in big nuclei

amatterof measuring and declination

but
wow
if true

////
a variable strenght oversized wineglass in big nuclei?
itwouldbe a beauty ifits true
all
a tick
a
l
o
t
more predictable

wow

if it turns out correct
eeeeekyey
lets findit

whatis the threshhold of energy or squeeze inside nucleus that it merges
maybe edges off

ohwow if true

/////
the newatom newelectron is not only about shape itis a chargeimbalance spikeout
i declinated some likely shapes ofthis but

measuring is the true accuracy then

lets verify a peculiar specialty that if above certain nuclei sizes someofthe chargeimbalanced spikedout merge as one
this mustbe above a certain energy threshhold or nucleuspressure
itis possible

******
seeit as how does the wineglass getout from inside huge nuclei

this can only be measured the deformations i suspected were shingle clownmouth cone with outer weakened ofcourse
******

letsnot be ignorant this can alter some big atom calculations

if it is not the case nothinglost nothing gained

/////
pics customers of new atom

ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before

and

lets not be ignorant

(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature

when we findit

it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!

when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost

allthebest

/////
btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

#atomic #educated #guess #question  .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookh avenlab @losalamosnatlab @rosaotm ‎ Letsmake an educated guess  “if the maginficently boring world of nulsbohr s shell model is rhymingsomewhat by shellcount:  ******** what?is? The?thresshold energy? To form n shellcount superwineglasses from afterall (!)cumulative chargeimbalancespike outsmallwineglasses ******** And is this thresshold always the same or doesthe second superwin eglass and or thrid have different threshholds” ‎

Whywouldoyuwant that russian chinese nuclear weapons dont detonate intheir backyard? Hmmm aeh… pe..ople?..aeh l ives? Aeh.. .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @ha rvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab  ‎

Whywouldoyuwant that russian chinese nuclear weapons dont detonate intheir backyard? Hmmm aeh… pe..ople?..aeh lives? Aeh.. .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab

Itis complementary to shells of bohr but itis not that

Superwineglass from smaller wineglass deformed wantsto surface because itis. A cumulative chargeimbalance spikeout

Thereon the refine is that isotopes would have different superwineglas combinations

Uinthinkable in shells model

So in simple
Whattheymayhave interpreted as orbit shells
Byplanets

May rhyme to superwineglasscount?
Lets verifyit

The divergence byisotope variant wouldmake different superwineglasses

Which chargeimbalance spikeout of electron is inwhich superwineglassl or atwhich threshhold they overjump ans change superwineglass is of interest too

W
H
E
E
E
E
Y

If.
Itis a correct tweak
Thatis

////

Letsreward whomeasures it first ‎
Heyatomics heyscience
Lets reward whomeasures it first

2
The new atom tweak affects the veryheavy atoms iehow does wineglass chargeimbalance spikeout gets actually tothe surface ifit does so deforms where and reshuffles the nucleus how now if it d o e s get tothesurface

the oldmodel was cumulative too but ididntthink of these might want to cumulate to one single spikeout chargeimbalance blobout

Letsnot bullshit around big nuclei

Itis simple but absolutely critical inthesense that nuclear pressure inside nucleus forming a cumulated cumulative big chargeimbalance
Means

There
Is
Inmother nature a thresshold after which own wineglass will be squeezed into superwineglass

********
This
Very
Energy
Threshhold
Is
Why there is
Matter

‎Reformed another proton and reformed anotherproton
And anther

Is this threshhold lower ie it occurs sooner onlower energies in smaller nuclei that squeeze

Then there maybe more than one superwineglasses depends onthe core internal nuclear composition

‎Ie these wineglasses wantttothe surface and that superwineglass isontheoiter side odthe atom

So theyform a
Second wuperwineglass

Simple
Reallysimple
Stuff
But
We
Must
M
U
S
T
Measure it

Itis a declination derived from cumulative chargeimabalce spikeout
And breaks down into merged cumulated superwineglass
Onincreased nucleus pressure
********

/////

****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this‎ Very Threshhold ‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

Lets reward the f i r s t that measures it or disprooves it
Thereisno way icanmeasure atomic nuclear electron shapes

Atomics But someone will measure yup cumulative bigwineglasssquueezewith threshhold to meld so itwill merge at this point protonneutroncount withthefirst big cumulation and thesecount the second big cumulation

Depends on mergethreshholds onthatcount a third and so on

there wereserobullshit withthe measurer geniusses

‎Energypeople are
Brilliant
They

Would find in quicker than quick a true or false
Ifits falseits likethe modelbefore
Ifits a merge meld threshhold and iam eeeeek since 250am becasue the chargeimbalance spilkeout
M
U
S
T
Be cumulative thenitis a miracle in matterformationdetail
S
Itmeans atleastone or more supercumulationsareposisble

******
Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this
Very
Threshhold
‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond
Which.
Very.
Merge meld threshhold
This.
Is
Critical
**************

Where
Is
This
Point

Ifitis correct

W
H
E
E
E
E
E
E
Y
Cmoooon!! Letsfindit!

Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

////
the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure
andor bond extremely on other neutrons

or and in neutronlacking isotopes? with high nucleus pressure atleast?
allofthis stuff is declination and measure

////
itis a matter of measuring now

ifthere are threshholds after which the chargeimbalance spikeout recumulates

because it is a cumulative charge imbalance as typed then itmay form notnecessarily unlimited sizes

itwould mean

howmany enlarged wineglasses then as bottompart of it?

howdoesitlook

i
f

correct hypothesis theory that is

arethere cumulation threshholds afterwhich chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass chargeimbalances merge

and what are their sizelimits

bigger size fewer super wineglasses

smaller threshholds? more supersized ?

itis a matter measurable in big nuclei

amatterof measuring and declination

but
wow
if true

////
a variable strenght oversized wineglass in big nuclei?
itwouldbe a beauty ifits true
all
a tick
a
l
o
t
more predictable

wow

if it turns out correct
eeeeekyey
lets findit

whatis the threshhold of energy or squeeze inside nucleus that it merges
maybe edges off

ohwow if true

/////
the newatom newelectron is not only about shape itis a chargeimbalance spikeout
i declinated some likely shapes ofthis but

measuring is the true accuracy then

lets verify a peculiar specialty that if above certain nuclei sizes someofthe chargeimbalanced spikedout merge as one
this mustbe above a certain energy threshhold or nucleuspressure
itis possible

******
seeit as how does the wineglass getout from inside huge nuclei

this can only be measured the deformations i suspected were shingle clownmouth cone with outer weakened ofcourse
******

letsnot be ignorant this can alter some big atom calculations

if it is not the case nothinglost nothing gained

/////
pics customers of new atom

ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before

and

lets not be ignorant

(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature

when we findit

it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!

when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost

allthebest

/////
btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

Whywouldoyuwant that russian chinese nuclear weapons dont detonate intheir backyard? Hmmm aeh… pe..ople?..aeh l ives? Aeh.. .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @ha rvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab  ‎

.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab  ‎ ‎ Itis complementary to shells of bohr but itis not that  Superwineglass from smaller wineglass deformed wantsto surface be cause itis. A cumulative chargeimbalance spikeout  ‎ Thereon the refine is that isotopes would have different superwineglas combinations

.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab

Itis complementary to shells of bohr but itis not that

Superwineglass from smaller wineglass deformed wantsto surface because itis. A cumulative chargeimbalance spikeout

Thereon the refine is that isotopes would have different superwineglas combinations

Uinthinkable in shells model

So in simple
Whattheymayhave interpreted as orbit shells
Byplanets

May rhyme to superwineglasscount?
Lets verifyit

The divergence byisotope variant wouldmake different superwineglasses

Which chargeimbalance spikeout of electron is inwhich superwineglassl or atwhich threshhold they overjump ans change superwineglass is of interest too

W
H
E
E
E
E
Y

If.
Itis a correct tweak
Thatis

////

Letsreward whomeasures it first ‎
Heyatomics heyscience
Lets reward whomeasures it first

2
The new atom tweak affects the veryheavy atoms iehow does wineglass chargeimbalance spikeout gets actually tothe surface ifit does so deforms where and reshuffles the nucleus how now if it d o e s get tothesurface

the oldmodel was cumulative too but ididntthink of these might want to cumulate to one single spikeout chargeimbalance blobout

Letsnot bullshit around big nuclei

Itis simple but absolutely critical inthesense that nuclear pressure inside nucleus forming a cumulated cumulative big chargeimbalance
Means

There
Is
Inmother nature a thresshold after which own wineglass will be squeezed into superwineglass

********
This
Very
Energy
Threshhold
Is
Why there is
Matter

‎Reformed another proton and reformed anotherproton
And anther

Is this threshhold lower ie it occurs sooner onlower energies in smaller nuclei that squeeze

Then there maybe more than one superwineglasses depends onthe core internal nuclear composition

‎Ie these wineglasses wantttothe surface and that superwineglass isontheoiter side odthe atom

So theyform a
Second wuperwineglass

Simple
Reallysimple
Stuff
But
We
Must
M
U
S
T
Measure it

Itis a declination derived from cumulative chargeimabalce spikeout
And breaks down into merged cumulated superwineglass
Onincreased nucleus pressure
********

/////

****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this‎ Very Threshhold ‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

Lets reward the f i r s t that measures it or disprooves it
Thereisno way icanmeasure atomic nuclear electron shapes

Atomics But someone will measure yup cumulative bigwineglasssquueezewith threshhold to meld so itwill merge at this point protonneutroncount withthefirst big cumulation and thesecount the second big cumulation

Depends on mergethreshholds onthatcount a third and so on

there wereserobullshit withthe measurer geniusses

‎Energypeople are
Brilliant
They

Would find in quicker than quick a true or false
Ifits falseits likethe modelbefore
Ifits a merge meld threshhold and iam eeeeek since 250am becasue the chargeimbalance spilkeout
M
U
S
T
Be cumulative thenitis a miracle in matterformationdetail
S
Itmeans atleastone or more supercumulationsareposisble

******
Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this
Very
Threshhold
‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond
Which.
Very.
Merge meld threshhold
This.
Is
Critical
**************

Where
Is
This
Point

Ifitis correct

W
H
E
E
E
E
E
E
Y
Cmoooon!! Letsfindit!

Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

////
the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure
andor bond extremely on other neutrons

or and in neutronlacking isotopes? with high nucleus pressure atleast?
allofthis stuff is declination and measure

////
itis a matter of measuring now

ifthere are threshholds after which the chargeimbalance spikeout recumulates

because it is a cumulative charge imbalance as typed then itmay form notnecessarily unlimited sizes

itwould mean

howmany enlarged wineglasses then as bottompart of it?

howdoesitlook

i
f

correct hypothesis theory that is

arethere cumulation threshholds afterwhich chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass chargeimbalances merge

and what are their sizelimits

bigger size fewer super wineglasses

smaller threshholds? more supersized ?

itis a matter measurable in big nuclei

amatterof measuring and declination

but
wow
if true

////
a variable strenght oversized wineglass in big nuclei?
itwouldbe a beauty ifits true
all
a tick
a
l
o
t
more predictable

wow

if it turns out correct
eeeeekyey
lets findit

whatis the threshhold of energy or squeeze inside nucleus that it merges
maybe edges off

ohwow if true

/////
the newatom newelectron is not only about shape itis a chargeimbalance spikeout
i declinated some likely shapes ofthis but

measuring is the true accuracy then

lets verify a peculiar specialty that if above certain nuclei sizes someofthe chargeimbalanced spikedout merge as one
this mustbe above a certain energy threshhold or nucleuspressure
itis possible

******
seeit as how does the wineglass getout from inside huge nuclei

this can only be measured the deformations i suspected were shingle clownmouth cone with outer weakened ofcourse
******

letsnot be ignorant this can alter some big atom calculations

if it is not the case nothinglost nothing gained

/////
pics customers of new atom

ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before

and

lets not be ignorant

(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature

when we findit

it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!

when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost

allthebest

/////
btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab  ‎ ‎ Itis complementary to shells of bohr but itis not that  Superwineglass from smaller wineglass deformed wantsto surface be cause itis. A cumulative chargeimbalance spikeout  ‎ Thereon the refine is that isotopes would have different superwineglas combinations

Letsreward whomeasures it first .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @nature physics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab    ‎ Heyatomics heyscience Lets reward whomeasures it first 2 The new atom tweak affects the veryheavy atoms iehow does wineglass chargeimbalance spikeout gets actually tothe surface ifit does so deforms where and reshuffles the nucleus how now if it d o e s get tothesurface the oldmodel was cumulative too but ididntthink of these might wa nt to cumulate to one single spikeout chargeimbalance blobout Letsnot bullshit around big nuclei  Itis simple but absolutely critical inthesense that nuclear pressure inside nucleus forming a cumulated cumulative big chargeimbal ance Means There Is Inmother nature a thresshold after which own wineglass will be sq ueezed into superwineglass ******** This Very Energy Threshhold Is Why there is Matter ‎Reformed another proton and reformed anotherproton And anther Is this threshhold lower ie it occurs sooner onlower energies in smaller nuclei that squeeze Then there maybe more than one superwineglasses depends onthe cor e internal nuclear composition ‎Ie these wineglasses wantttothe surface and that superwineglass isontheoiter side odthe atom So theyform a Second wuperwineglass Simple Reallysimple Stuff But We Must M U S T Measure it Itis a declination derived from cumulative chargeimabalce spikeout  And breaks down into merged cumulated superwineglass Onincreased nucleus pressure ******** /////

Letsreward whomeasures it first .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab

Heyatomics heyscience
Lets reward whomeasures it first

2
The new atom tweak affects the veryheavy atoms iehow does wineglass chargeimbalance spikeout gets actually tothe surface ifit does so deforms where and reshuffles the nucleus how now if it d o e s get tothesurface

the oldmodel was cumulative too but ididntthink of these might want to cumulate to one single spikeout chargeimbalance blobout

Letsnot bullshit around big nuclei

Itis simple but absolutely critical inthesense that nuclear pressure inside nucleus forming a cumulated cumulative big chargeimbalance
Means

There
Is
Inmother nature a thresshold after which own wineglass will be squeezed into superwineglass

********
This
Very
Energy
Threshhold
Is
Why there is
Matter

‎Reformed another proton and reformed anotherproton
And anther

Is this threshhold lower ie it occurs sooner onlower energies in smaller nuclei that squeeze

Then there maybe more than one superwineglasses depends onthe core internal nuclear composition

‎Ie these wineglasses wantttothe surface and that superwineglass isontheoiter side odthe atom

So theyform a
Second wuperwineglass

Simple
Reallysimple
Stuff
But
We
Must
M
U
S
T
Measure it

Itis a declination derived from cumulative chargeimabalce spikeout
And breaks down into merged cumulated superwineglass
Onincreased nucleus pressure
********

/////

****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this‎ Very Threshhold ‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

Lets reward the f i r s t that measures it or disprooves it
Thereisno way icanmeasure atomic nuclear electron shapes

Atomics But someone will measure yup cumulative bigwineglasssquueezewith threshhold to meld so itwill merge at this point protonneutroncount withthefirst big cumulation and thesecount the second big cumulation

Depends on mergethreshholds onthatcount a third and so on

there wereserobullshit withthe measurer geniusses

‎Energypeople are
Brilliant
They

Would find in quicker than quick a true or false
Ifits falseits likethe modelbefore
Ifits a merge meld threshhold and iam eeeeek since 250am becasue the chargeimbalance spilkeout
M
U
S
T
Be cumulative thenitis a miracle in matterformationdetail
S
Itmeans atleastone or more supercumulationsareposisble

******
Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this
Very
Threshhold
‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond
Which.
Very.
Merge meld threshhold
This.
Is
Critical
**************

Where
Is
This
Point

Ifitis correct

W
H
E
E
E
E
E
E
Y
Cmoooon!! Letsfindit!

Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

////
the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure
andor bond extremely on other neutrons

or and in neutronlacking isotopes? with high nucleus pressure atleast?
allofthis stuff is declination and measure

////
itis a matter of measuring now

ifthere are threshholds after which the chargeimbalance spikeout recumulates

because it is a cumulative charge imbalance as typed then itmay form notnecessarily unlimited sizes

itwould mean

howmany enlarged wineglasses then as bottompart of it?

howdoesitlook

i
f

correct hypothesis theory that is

arethere cumulation threshholds afterwhich chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass chargeimbalances merge

and what are their sizelimits

bigger size fewer super wineglasses

smaller threshholds? more supersized ?

itis a matter measurable in big nuclei

amatterof measuring and declination

but
wow
if true

////
a variable strenght oversized wineglass in big nuclei?
itwouldbe a beauty ifits true
all
a tick
a
l
o
t
more predictable

wow

if it turns out correct
eeeeekyey
lets findit

whatis the threshhold of energy or squeeze inside nucleus that it merges
maybe edges off

ohwow if true

/////
the newatom newelectron is not only about shape itis a chargeimbalance spikeout
i declinated some likely shapes ofthis but

measuring is the true accuracy then

lets verify a peculiar specialty that if above certain nuclei sizes someofthe chargeimbalanced spikedout merge as one
this mustbe above a certain energy threshhold or nucleuspressure
itis possible

******
seeit as how does the wineglass getout from inside huge nuclei

this can only be measured the deformations i suspected were shingle clownmouth cone with outer weakened ofcourse
******

letsnot be ignorant this can alter some big atom calculations

if it is not the case nothinglost nothing gained

/////
pics customers of new atom

ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before

and

lets not be ignorant

(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature

when we findit

it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!

when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost

allthebest

/////
btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

Letsreward whomeasures it first .@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @nature physics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab    ‎ Heyatomics heyscience Lets reward whomeasures it first 2 The new atom tweak affects the veryheavy atoms iehow does wineglass chargeimbalance spikeout gets actually tothe surface ifit does so deforms where and reshuffles the nucleus how now if it d o e s get tothesurface the oldmodel was cumulative too but ididntthink of these might wa nt to cumulate to one single spikeout chargeimbalance blobout Letsnot bullshit around big nuclei  Itis simple but absolutely critical inthesense that nuclear pressure inside nucleus forming a cumulated cumulative big chargeimbal ance Means There Is Inmother nature a thresshold after which own wineglass will be sq ueezed into superwineglass ******** This Very Energy Threshhold Is Why there is Matter ‎Reformed another proton and reformed anotherproton And anther Is this threshhold lower ie it occurs sooner onlower energies in smaller nuclei that squeeze Then there maybe more than one superwineglasses depends onthe cor e internal nuclear composition ‎Ie these wineglasses wantttothe surface and that superwineglass isontheoiter side odthe atom So theyform a Second wuperwineglass Simple Reallysimple Stuff But We Must M U S T Measure it Itis a declination derived from cumulative chargeimabalce spikeout  And breaks down into merged cumulated superwineglass Onincreased nucleus pressure ******** /////

.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab  ****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim m atter , but forms a proton because of this‎ Very Threshhold ‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeez e  beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout c hargeimbalance

.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab ****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this‎ Very Threshhold ‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

Lets reward the f i r s t that measures it or disprooves it
Thereisno way icanmeasure atomic nuclear electron shapes

Atomics But someone will measure yup cumulative bigwineglasssquueezewith threshhold to meld so itwill merge at this point protonneutroncount withthefirst big cumulation and thesecount the second big cumulation

Depends on mergethreshholds onthatcount a third and so on

there wereserobullshit withthe measurer geniusses

‎Energypeople are
Brilliant
They

Would find in quicker than quick a true or false
Ifits falseits likethe modelbefore
Ifits a merge meld threshhold and iam eeeeek since 250am becasue the chargeimbalance spilkeout
M
U
S
T
Be cumulative thenitis a miracle in matterformationdetail
S
Itmeans atleastone or more supercumulationsareposisble

******
Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim matter , but forms a proton because of this
Very
Threshhold
‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeeze beyond
Which.
Very.
Merge meld threshhold
This.
Is
Critical
**************

Where
Is
This
Point

Ifitis correct

W
H
E
E
E
E
E
E
Y
Cmoooon!! Letsfindit!

Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout chargeimbalance

////
the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure
andor bond extremely on other neutrons

or and in neutronlacking isotopes? with high nucleus pressure atleast?
allofthis stuff is declination and measure

////
itis a matter of measuring now

ifthere are threshholds after which the chargeimbalance spikeout recumulates

because it is a cumulative charge imbalance as typed then itmay form notnecessarily unlimited sizes

itwould mean

howmany enlarged wineglasses then as bottompart of it?

howdoesitlook

i
f

correct hypothesis theory that is

arethere cumulation threshholds afterwhich chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass chargeimbalances merge

and what are their sizelimits

bigger size fewer super wineglasses

smaller threshholds? more supersized ?

itis a matter measurable in big nuclei

amatterof measuring and declination

but
wow
if true

////
a variable strenght oversized wineglass in big nuclei?
itwouldbe a beauty ifits true
all
a tick
a
l
o
t
more predictable

wow

if it turns out correct
eeeeekyey
lets findit

whatis the threshhold of energy or squeeze inside nucleus that it merges
maybe edges off

ohwow if true

/////
the newatom newelectron is not only about shape itis a chargeimbalance spikeout
i declinated some likely shapes ofthis but

measuring is the true accuracy then

lets verify a peculiar specialty that if above certain nuclei sizes someofthe chargeimbalanced spikedout merge as one
this mustbe above a certain energy threshhold or nucleuspressure
itis possible

******
seeit as how does the wineglass getout from inside huge nuclei

this can only be measured the deformations i suspected were shingle clownmouth cone with outer weakened ofcourse
******

letsnot be ignorant this can alter some big atom calculations

if it is not the case nothinglost nothing gained

/////
pics customers of new atom

ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before

and

lets not be ignorant

(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature

when we findit

it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!

when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost

allthebest

/////
btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab  ****** Itmeans that the matterformation mattercreation doesnt form ablackhole ie an exotic cumulation of subatomic energy andor interim m atter , but forms a proton because of this‎ Very Threshhold ‎Why we make atleast one supercumulation wineglass squeez e  beyond Which. Very. Merge meld threshhold This. Is Critical ************** Where Is This Point Ifitis correct W H E E E E E E Y Cmoooon!! Letsfindit! Ittellsus also with muon disintegration per ring size pervelocity which energybondings occur tothe electron tothiswineglas itismore thanthe 4kev of electron hammeroutof orbit but that which keeps muon energy on electrons is the neutron bond incontrary tothis thresshold proton threshhold energy becomes matter and spikesout c hargeimbalance

@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysi cs @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @l osalamosnatlab  the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure  andor bond extremely on other neutrons

.@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysics @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @losalamosnatlab

the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure
andor bond extremely on other neutrons

or and in neutronlacking isotopes? with high nucleus pressure atleast?
allofthis stuff is declination and measure

////
itis a matter of measuring now

ifthere are threshholds after which the chargeimbalance spikeout recumulates

because it is a cumulative charge imbalance as typed then itmay form notnecessarily unlimited sizes

itwould mean

howmany enlarged wineglasses then as bottompart of it?

howdoesitlook

i
f

correct hypothesis theory that is

arethere cumulation threshholds afterwhich chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass chargeimbalances merge

and what are their sizelimits

bigger size fewer super wineglasses

smaller threshholds? more supersized ?

itis a matter measurable in big nuclei

amatterof measuring and declination

but
wow
if true

////
a variable strenght oversized wineglass in big nuclei?
itwouldbe a beauty ifits true
all
a tick
a
l
o
t
more predictable

wow

if it turns out correct
eeeeekyey
lets findit

whatis the threshhold of energy or squeeze inside nucleus that it merges
maybe edges off

ohwow if true

/////
the newatom newelectron is not only about shape itis a chargeimbalance spikeout
i declinated some likely shapes ofthis but

measuring is the true accuracy then

lets verify a peculiar specialty that if above certain nuclei sizes someofthe chargeimbalanced spikedout merge as one
this mustbe above a certain energy threshhold or nucleuspressure
itis possible

******
seeit as how does the wineglass getout from inside huge nuclei

this can only be measured the deformations i suspected were shingle clownmouth cone with outer weakened ofcourse
******

letsnot be ignorant this can alter some big atom calculations

if it is not the case nothinglost nothing gained

/////
pics customers of new atom

ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before

and

lets not be ignorant

(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature

when we findit

it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!

when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost

allthebest

/////
btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

@sciam @science @nature @quantamag @energy @nnsa @iaeaorg .@science @naturephysi cs @harvard #newatom #new #electron @atom @atomic @livermore_lab @brookhavenlab @l osalamosnatlab  the threshhold ofthe effect wouldoccur when the first proton or protons wouldbarely get surface exposure  andor bond extremely on other neutrons

#customers #of #newatom #newelectron @quantamag .@sciam .@na ture @physics .@physics .@science @energy .@energy .@atom @live rmore_lab @brookhavenlav @harvard  customers of new atom ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models be fore and  lets not be ignorant (!!!!!!) b i g nuclei  v ery huge nuclei might have a measurable feature when we findi t it is enhanced further especially big nuclei! related! when itis an incorrect hypothesis  nothing lost allthebest

#customers #of #newatom #newelectron @quantamag .@sciam .@nature @physics .@physics .@science @energy .@energy .@atom @livermore_lab @brookhavenlav @harvard

customers of new atom

ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models before

and

lets not be ignorant

(!!!!!!) b i g nuclei very huge nuclei might have a measurable feature

when we findit

it is enhanced further
especially big nuclei! related!

when itis an incorrect hypothesis
nothing lost

allthebest
/////

btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

#customers #of #newatom #newelectron @quantamag .@sciam .@na ture @physics .@physics .@science @energy .@energy .@atom @live rmore_lab @brookhavenlav @harvard  customers of new atom ask the magnitude howmuchmore precise itis than cloud models be fore and  lets not be ignorant (!!!!!!) b i g nuclei  v ery huge nuclei might have a measurable feature when we findi t it is enhanced further especially big nuclei! related! when itis an incorrect hypothesis  nothing lost allthebest

.@sciam .@nature @physics .@physics .@science @energy .@energy .@atom @livermore_lab @brookhavenla v @harvard  btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople ******* if t he chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass i s extre mely cumulative lets verify if there is a thre shhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to o ne big  andthisisthe excitationmystery ********

.@sciam .@nature @physics .@physics .@science @energy .@energy .@atom @livermore_lab @brookhavenlav @harvard

btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople

*******
if the chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass
i
s
extremely cumulative
lets verify if there is
a

threshhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to one big

andthisisthe excitationmystery
********

patentonme iftrue itisa a boldguess

some social justice post about trickle down inspired me abit

but theremay be a energy threshhold for merger

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

///

Whatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

/////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////
Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

.@sciam .@nature @physics .@physics .@science @energy .@energy .@atom @livermore_lab @brookhavenla v @harvard  btw btw btw btw new atom new electronpeople ******* if t he chargeimbalance spikeout wineglass i s extre mely cumulative lets verify if there is a thre shhold energy level at which the wineglasses ofmany protons simply merge to o ne big  andthisisthe excitationmystery ********

thismail didnt getout 157am ”  @fact 2yearsago i reinstalled win dows10 because ididntknow takeown.exe /a or icacls /grant @wired @ wireduk @microsoft @windows @windowsdev ithink it  n e e e e e d s   trustedinstaller owner creator and system hmm but sth fi shy which where hmmm”  I am Christian KISS BabyAWACS – Raw I ndependent Sophistication #THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG https ://www.BabyAWACS.com/ Inquiry@BabyAWACS.com PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64 Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate. paypal.me/ChristianKiss

thismail didnt getout 157am ” @fact 2yearsago i reinstalled windows10 because ididntknow takeown.exe /a or icacls /grant @wired @wireduk @microsoft @windows @windowsdev

ithink it n e e e e e d s
trustedinstaller
owner creator
and system

hmm but sth fishy which where hmmm”

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

thismail didnt getout 157am ”  @fact 2yearsago i reinstalled win dows10 because ididntknow takeown.exe /a or icacls /grant @wired @ wireduk @microsoft @windows @windowsdev ithink it  n e e e e e d s   trustedinstaller owner creator and system hmm but sth fi shy which where hmmm”  I am Christian KISS BabyAWACS – Raw I ndependent Sophistication #THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG https ://www.BabyAWACS.com/ Inquiry@BabyAWACS.com PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64 Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate. paypal.me/ChristianKiss

@all @world camera attentionshake its NOT ok china gets #LNL6 #LNL7 else meh or thumbsup they do getit ‎ @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@ tim_cook @nsagov @gchq  Fear of chinese embargos? ////

@all @world camera attentionshake its NOT ok china gets #LNL6 #LNL7 else meh or thumbsup they do getit
@energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@tim_cook @nsagov @gchq
Fear of chinese embargos?

////

Slower but ?energyefficient? Mode? #LnL6 #LNL7

hatisourmost efficient call pushpull model sofar

Letsplay with an intrinsic sorting
Electrons are slow

Remember: they alterthe databeam andthe databeam alters thephoton as steering for readout

There onitisa matter of declinating which readoutmeans

Theradio part istheside effect
How does it change with shorthops this

Tweak

Icant thinkwell anymore but this is the thing imean
Lets playwithit and declinate it in the current LNL6 LNL7systems
And compare push pull call functions

////

Can we keep the electrons spinninglongernow a pull after emission and push re emission. We can remove superpositionspairing

Simplest example icna comeupwith:

********
Sourcedrain 1: emmits single e-
sourcedrain 2: ‎adjacent has a strong pull drain only

e- triesto get there afteremmission with energy1 a piece of predictability

Photonbeam holdsit with certainenergy‎ relaysit reroutesit.

Sofar so bad

Sourcedrain 3: emmits a paired superposition
Sourcedrain 4: adjacent pulls one of paired e- ends superposition

Or photonbeam averts it and keeps em paired
*******

/////

#milder #LNL6 #LNL7 #tweak

#LNL6 #LNL7 makers Ifwe sort sourcedrain emmitters binary asexample we can steerthem sothat 0 soaks up electron drain and 1 emmitts problemis the first drain picks theelectron if a photonic beam doesnt hold prevent stabilise or rearranges . Itisa mildertweak but it can intrinsically sort sourcedrain devices by atleastbinary

////
all #LNL6 #LNL7 makers

Thegermans suffocated dmaamaged damamgetemplated metoooften recentmonths so this LNL6 LNL7 tweak is abit clumsy

‎Iwonder whatsthe issue with it now and consideredto optimise push pull callfunctions

‎********
Lets create that drain effect inthe sourcedraindevice without the emmission of the electron

And soak in electron
But foremost
Aphotonic beam
Kicks it right intoplace or an holdsit atplace
********

Lets playwith this
Clock mode for push pull callfunctions

I am Christian KISS

BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG
https://www.BabyAWACS.com/

Inquiry@BabyAWACS.com
PHONE / FAX +493212 611 34 64

Helpful? Pay. Support. Donnate.
paypal.me/ChristianKiss

@all @world camera attentionshake its NOT ok china gets #LNL6 #LNL7 else meh or thumbsup they do getit ‎ @energy .@energy @ornl @nsagov @gchq @darpa @intel @amd @arm @samsung @huawei @apple .@apple .@ tim_cook @nsagov @gchq  Fear of chinese embargos? ////