@lockheedmartin @usaf @usmc @usnavy #enhancements #f35 75% of wingspan joint rudderelevators. Fuelfilled. Atleast onbaseFlat angle maybe 30-40degree Asmuch hiding behind mainwingHow would it loop Handle ir iir Turn rateSupercruiseWeightM a y b e rangeCost

@lockheedmartin @usaf @usmc @usnavy #enhancements #f35

75% of wingspan joint rudderelevators. Fuelfilled. Atleast onbase

Flat angle maybe 30-40degree
Asmuch hiding behind mainwing

How would it loop
Handle ir iir

Turn rate

Supercruise
Weight
M a y b e range

Cost!

While hedging strenght
S
T
E
A
L
T
H

Energy regain

///////

Now that the usaf knows what they got, let em fly a simulator or prototype of the enhanced version jointrudderelelvator thrustvector andifthey don’t want rather that-

Same
Cost

That
Is
The challenge

///////

Lockheed
Can’t u at least
S
I
M
U
L
A
T
E

That

Ifucant pay a prototype mod

//////////

Marines, a fuelfilled jointrudder elevator 75percent of f35b size, 66percent of f35c

Maybe abit smaller

Thrustvectoring

***************
-offset graviational jamming
-ir iir safety / or align methods of ir iir offset
-anticipate long waves in a simulator software simulator

-hedge strenghts stealth, quick energy regain, ir iir stealth with fuelfilled jointrudderelevator with thrustvector nozzle ***********

The paris airshow clearly showed that despite a likely somewhat washed overridemode- more agile than before usually definitely- but pilot hastily had to oversteer more- its obvious that if you want agility, with a stealth fighter,

*************
You
Give
It
Thrust
Vectoring
**************

That weakness is then expensive, melts the blades, quick energyloss, thatlatter this jet fixes best, a very quick energy regain.

U give it thrust vectoring, any stealthy jet, or u take it that its maneuverable enough,

and the last time the us had to dogfight was when the missiles sucked.

Do
The
Missiles
Suck

Inthis sense, all it has to beat is the agility of the f15 or somewhat near enough to it.

*********
If missiles ever may suck,
Give it thrust vectoring and that’s what they will do.

A quick plug n play optionality-
*********

hopefully a secret feature of the existing thrusters

I find it hard to believe the followup model of the f22 ofthe same firm didn’t give it at least 2d thrust vectoring.

What happens if we realign the blades separetly one by one each?

What you
R
E
A
L
L
Y

Want to fix is
When it goes by me:

***************
-offset graviational jamming
-ir iir safety / or align methods of ir iir offset
-anticipate long waves in a simulator software simulator

-hedge strenghts stealth, quick energy regain, ir iir stealth with jointrudderelevator with thrustvector nozzle ***********

Iget gaspoison neck drugpricjle andbehind earmixes now lymph. Squeeze 2234

I am Christian Kiss
BabyAWACS – Raw Independent Sophistication
#THINKTANK + #INTEL #HELLHOLE #BLOG

https://babyawacs.wordpress.com/
BabyAWACS@gmx.com

Useful what you read? Pay what you want at paypal.me/christiankiss

Advertisements
@lockheedmartin @usaf @usmc @usnavy #enhancements #f35 75% of wingspan joint rudderelevators. Fuelfilled. Atleast onbaseFlat angle maybe 30-40degree Asmuch hiding behind mainwingHow would it loop Handle ir iir Turn rateSupercruiseWeightM a y b e rangeCost

like what u read? drop a cookie into paypal.me/christiankiss purpose: BabyAWACS+topic

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s